Full access allows:
- Solve all tests online without limits;
- Remove all advertisements on website;
- Adding questions to favorite list;
- Save learning progress;
- Save results of practice exams;
- Watching all wrong answered questions.
The company moved to dismiss the federal claim, and the court granted the motion. The court's written order read in its entirety: «[The company's] motion to dismiss the federal claim is granted.» The scientist immediately appealed this decision to the court of appeals.
A scientist domiciled in State A brought a federal civil action against his former employer, a company incorporated and headquartered in State A, alleging retaliatory discharge under federal and state law and seeking damages under federal and state law.
This is a last question in category
« Go to questions from category Appealability and ReviewThere are no comments at the moment. If you found an error or think question is incorrect, tell everyone about it
Only signed in users can write comments
Signin
B is incorrect. This answer choice states the correct conclusion using incorrect legal reasoning. There is supplemental jurisdiction over the state-law claim. Further, whether an appeal is proper for the federal claim is not tied to jurisdiction over the state-law claim.
C is incorrect. To obtain a discretionary interlocutory appeal, the party seeking to appeal must apply to both the district and appellate courts to meet the statutory standards. See 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). Here, the scientist has appealed without attempting to satisfy that requirement, so the appeal cannot be treated as a discretionary interlocutory appeal.
D is incorrect. Under the final judgment rule, a judgment is not final until all the claims in the action have been resolved. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), a party can ask the court to certify a final judgment as to a resolved claim when it is separate and distinct from the unresolved claims and then appeal that decision. However, here the court would reject such a request because the federal and state claims overlap.