Full access allows:
- Solve all tests online without limits;
- Remove all advertisements on website;
- Adding questions to favorite list;
- Save learning progress;
- Save results of practice exams;
- Watching all wrong answered questions.
The buyer now claims that the title is unmarketable and has refused to close.
A title search revealed that the land was subject to an unsatisfied $50,000 mortgage and a right-of-way easement over a portion of the land.
A seller contracted to sell land to a buyer for $300,000. The contract provided that the closing would be 60 days after the contract was signed and that the seller would convey to the buyer a «marketable title» by a quitclaim deed at closing. The contract contained no other provisions regarding the title to be delivered to the buyer.
There are no comments at the moment. If you found an error or think question is incorrect, tell everyone about it
Only signed in users can write comments
Signin
Parties can contract for something less than «marketable title.» Quitclaim deeds transfer whatever title the grantor has to the grantee, even if that title is unmarketable. However, unless the parties specifically contract for this kind of conveyance, there will be an obligation to convey marketable title.
There is a variety of defects that may make a title unmarketable. Defects in the chain of title refer to any defect that indicates the vendor does not have the full interest which he purports to convey. Encumbrances, such as: (i) mortgages; (ii) liens; (iii) easements; (iv) use restrictions; (v) encroachments; or (vi) land-use and zoning violations can also make a title unmarketable.
After the closing, the deed typically replaces the real estate contract as the embodiment of the parties' relationship. Under the doctrine of merger, most obligations imposed by the contract of sale are discharged unless they are repeated in the deed. For example, if a purchaser contracted for merchantable title but accepts a quitclaim deed, the purchaser would not be able to sue on the contractual provisions if the title turns out to be defective. The purchaser in this scenario would be limited to the provisions on the deed. Thus, real estate contracts are only relevant during the gap between its signing and the delivery of the deed.
C is correct. Marketable title is title reasonably free from doubt, which generally means unencumbered fee simple with good record title. An easement may render a title unmarketable, especially with the type that would benefit a neighbor rather than the property owner. Here, the right-of-way easement would render the title unmarketable. Although the quitclaim deed only gives title to what the owner actually owns, the owner's promise to deliver marketable title means the buyer can refuse to close because this property does not have a marketable title.
A is incorrect. The right-of-way easement would render the title unmarketable.
B is incorrect. Quitclaim deeds still require an implied covenant to provide marketable title, unless it is waived in the contract. Quitclaim deeds do not negate the implied covenant to provide marketable title. EVERY land sale contract has an implied covenant of marketable title. Further, the seller specifically promised to deliver a «marketable» title to the buyer. Although the quitclaim deed only gives title to what the owner actually owns, the owner's promise to deliver marketable title means the buyer can refuse to close.
D is incorrect. A seller has the right to satisfy a mortgage at the closing with proceeds of the sale. If the purchase price is sufficient, the closing results in a marketable title. Although the title is unmarketable, it is because of the right-of-way easement. The proceeds of the sale would satisfy the mortgage.