Full access allows:
- Solve all tests online without limits;
- Remove all advertisements on website;
- Adding questions to favorite list;
- Save learning progress;
- Save results of practice exams;
- Watching all wrong answered questions.
24. How should the court handle this case?
A construction company submitted a bid that was lowest in cost, but the agency chose another bidder that offered more advantages on the other factors. The company that submitted the lowest bid sued the federal agency in federal district court. The only relief that the company sought was to enjoin the issuance of a contract to the prevailing bidder. The company was unable to obtain a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction. The agency awarded the contract to the bidder it had originally selected. Just as the new bridge was completed and opened, the suit came to trial.
A federal agency solicited bids to build a bridge on an interstate highway. In evaluating the bids, the agency took into account the cost of the bridge and other specified factors.
Comments (0)
There are no comments at the moment. If you found an error or think question is incorrect, tell everyone about it
Only signed in users can write comments
Signin
A is incorrect. The company did not seek damages. The only relief sought by the company was an injunction against awarding the contract to another bidder, and that relief is no longer available.
C is incorrect. Discretionary decisions of federal officials are not necessarily immune from review by the courts.
D is incorrect. The only relief sought by the company was an injunction against awarding the contract to another bidder, and that relief is no longer available. The case is moot; therefore the court will not consider the merits of the dispute.