Full access allows:
- Solve all tests online without limits;
- Remove all advertisements on website;
- Adding questions to favorite list;
- Save learning progress;
- Save results of practice exams;
- Watching all wrong answered questions.
A consumer brought a federal diversity action in State A against a manufacturer, asserting products liability claims under State A law. The consumer sought to bring the action on behalf of a nationwide class. State A law prohibits such class actions.
This is a last question in category
« Go to questions from category Law Applied by Federal CourtsThere are no comments at the moment. If you found an error or think question is incorrect, tell everyone about it
Only signed in users can write comments
Signin
B is incorrect. The court will apply a valid and on point federal rule. A showing of a «substantial federal interest» is not required.
C is incorrect. The outcome-determinative test applies only when state law conflicts with a judge-made federal practice. A valid and on point federal rule will apply over a state rule in a federal action even if the differences in the two rules would satisfy the outcome-determinative test.
D is incorrect. Under the Erie doctrine, the court must apply federal procedural laws and state substantive laws. Thus, the procedural rules of the state whose substantive law is being applied are displaced.