Full access allows:
- Solve all tests online without limits;
- Remove all advertisements on website;
- Adding questions to favorite list;
- Save learning progress;
- Save results of practice exams;
- Watching all wrong answered questions.
The son has sued the woman to establish who owns Greenacre.
The recording act of the jurisdiction provides: «No unrecorded conveyance or mortgage of real property shall be good against subsequent purchasers for value without notice, who shall first record.» No other statute is applicable.
Greenacre at all relevant times has been vacant unoccupied land.
The owner of Greenacre, conveyed Greenacre by quitclaim deed as a gift to a woman, who did not then record her deed. Later, the owner conveyed Greenacre by warranty deed to a neighbor, who paid valuable consideration, knew nothing of the woman's claim, and promptly and properly recorded. Next, the woman recorded her deed. Then the neighbor conveyed Greenacre by quitclaim deed to her son as a gift. When the possible conflict with the woman was discovered, the son recorded his deed.
There are no comments at the moment. If you found an error or think question is incorrect, tell everyone about it
Only signed in users can write comments
Signin
A is incorrect. The woman will not prevail because the neighbor recorded her interest first and had no notice of the woman's title. The fact that the woman was a donee is a red herring that would only be relevant if she was a subsequent grantee.
C is incorrect. The woman will not prevail by recording before the son because the neighbor had already recorded before her. Therefore, the neighbor had superior title to Greenacre.
D is incorrect. As addressed above, the neighbor's recording cut off any rights that the woman may have had.