Full access allows:
- Solve all tests online without limits;
- Remove all advertisements on website;
- Adding questions to favorite list;
- Save learning progress;
- Save results of practice exams;
- Watching all wrong answered questions.
The jury returned a verdict for the homeowner. The manufacturer asked the court to poll the jury, and the poll revealed a 4 to 3 vote in favor of the homeowner. The manufacturer objected to the verdict and has moved for a new trial.
A homeowner brought a federal diversity action against a manufacturer of gas grills, asserting products liability claims and seeking damages for injuries she had suffered when her grill exploded as she was lighting it. The manufacturer timely demanded a jury trial, and the court informed the parties that it would seat a seven-person jury. The parties agreed to a non-unanimous jury verdict.
This is a last question in category
« Go to questions from category Verdicts and JudgmentsThere are no comments at the moment. If you found an error or think question is incorrect, tell everyone about it
Only signed in users can write comments
Signin
B is incorrect. There is no need for the jury to deliberate further because both parties agreed to a non-unanimous verdict.
C is incorrect. There is no requirement that a jury verdict be agreed to by at least six jurors.
D is incorrect. The manufacturer's motion for a new trial should be denied because both parties agreed to a non-unanimous verdict under FRCP 48.