Full access allows:
- Solve all tests online without limits;
- Remove all advertisements on website;
- Adding questions to favorite list;
- Save learning progress;
- Save results of practice exams;
- Watching all wrong answered questions.
On June 1, a widget manufacturer entered into a written agreement with a tool maker in which the tool maker agreed to produce and sell to the manufacturer 12 sets of newly designed dies to be delivered August 1 for the price of $50,000, payable 10 days after delivery. Encountering unexpected expenses in the purchase of special alloy steel required for the dies, the tool maker advised the manufacturer that production costs would exceed the contract price; and on July 1, the manufacturer and the tool maker signed a modification to the June 1 agreement increasing the contract price to $60,000. After timely receipt of 12 sets of dies conforming to the contract specifications, the manufacturer paid the tool maker $50,000 but refused to pay more.
There are no comments at the moment. If you found an error or think question is incorrect, tell everyone about it
Only signed in users can write comments
Signin
A is incorrect. The UCC does not require consideration for good faith modifications.
B and D are incorrect. The facts do not show either detrimental reliance or unconscionability.