Full access allows:
- Solve all tests online without limits;
- Remove all advertisements on website;
- Adding questions to favorite list;
- Save learning progress;
- Save results of practice exams;
- Watching all wrong answered questions.
A defendant is on trial for robbing a bank in State A. She testified that she was in State B at the time of the robbery. The defendant calls her friend, a witness, to testify that two days before the robbery the defendant told him that she was going to spend the next three days in State B.
There are no comments at the moment. If you found an error or think question is incorrect, tell everyone about it
Only signed in users can write comments
Signin
A is incorrect. The defendant's statement that she was going to State B for the next three days is not a statement describing or explaining an event or condition, and it was not made while the defendant was perceiving that event or condition. It is thus not a present sense impression, it is a statement of then-existing state of mind.
C is incorrect. It misstates the standard for determining admissible hearsay statements. This answer is also incorrect because the statement is offered to show that the defendant had plans, not to show that the defendant followed through with those plans.
D is incorrect. The statement, although hearsay, falls under the then-existing state of mind exception to the hearsay rule.