Full access allows:
- Solve all tests online without limits;
- Remove all advertisements on website;
- Adding questions to favorite list;
- Save learning progress;
- Save results of practice exams;
- Watching all wrong answered questions.
A shareholder of a car manufacturing company wants to sue the company in federal court for breach of fiduciary duty.
There are no comments at the moment. If you found an error or think question is incorrect, tell everyone about it
Only signed in users can write comments
Signin
A is incorrect. Where a company distributes its cars does not bear on citizenship for purposes of diversity jurisdiction. Rather, the place of distribution may be relevant to where the company could be subject to personal jurisdiction in this action.
B is incorrect. The concept of minimum contacts is relevant to a determination of personal jurisdiction, not subject-matter jurisdiction.
D is incorrect. In Hertz, the Supreme Court ruled that a company's principal place of business for purposes of diversity is the location where its high-level officers direct and control the corporation's activities, typically its headquarters. Hertz Corp. v. Friend, 559 U.S. 77 (2010).