Full access allows:
- Solve all tests online without limits;
- Remove all advertisements on website;
- Adding questions to favorite list;
- Save learning progress;
- Save results of practice exams;
- Watching all wrong answered questions.
A woman sued her former employer in state court, asserting age and sex discrimination claims under both state and federal law. The woman's attorney had recently been embarrassed in court by the judge to whom the case was assigned. Wishing to avoid difficulties with the judge, the woman's attorney promptly removed the case to federal court on the basis of federal-question jurisdiction. The employer's attorney has timely moved to remand.
There are no comments at the moment. If you found an error or think question is incorrect, tell everyone about it
Only signed in users can write comments
Signin
B is incorrect. Although a federal court can remand claims based on state law, here, the federal claims should also be remanded because removal was improper, to begin with.
C is incorrect. Although it is true that removal is intended to protect against bias that would be present in a state court, that is not a sufficient reason to remove to federal court, nor does it override the removal requirements. One such requirement is that only the defendant may remove to federal court. Here, the plaintiff removed to federal court, and thus a remand is proper.
D is incorrect. This answer correctly notes that the woman is asserting federal claims, but it was the woman (the plaintiff) who removed, and removal is a right that only the defendant may exercise. Thus, this answer choice misapplies the law.