Full access allows:
- Solve all tests online without limits;
- Remove all advertisements on website;
- Adding questions to favorite list;
- Save learning progress;
- Save results of practice exams;
- Watching all wrong answered questions.
A patent holder brought a patent infringement action in federal court against a licensee of the patent. The patent holder believed that a jury would be more sympathetic to his claims than a judge, and asked his lawyer to obtain a jury trial.
There are no comments at the moment. If you found an error or think question is incorrect, tell everyone about it
Only signed in users can write comments
Signin
A is correct. To secure the patent holder's right to a jury trial, the lawyer should file and serve the complaint, including a jury trial demand. FRCP 38(b)(1) specifically allows for a demand for a jury trial to be included in a pleading. By including it within a properly-filed and -served complaint, the patent holder's right will be secured.
B is incorrect. The close of discovery often occurs months or even years after the beginning of a civil suit in federal court. FRCP 38(b)(1) requires the jury demand to be filed no later than 14 days after service of the last pleading directed to the issue on which a jury is sought. To wait until the close of discovery would certainly be after the close of pleadings, and the patent holder's right to a jury trial would be waived.
C is incorrect. This answer choice misstates the proper time period for filing a jury demand. FRCP 38(1) requires the demand to be filed and served no later than 14 days after the last pleading on that issue has been served.
D is incorrect. As previously stated, a jury trial demand must be served no later than 14 days after service of the last pleading directed to the issue on which a jury is sought. The initial pre-trial conference likely will not be scheduled until weeks after the pleadings have closed. Therefore, making the demand at the initial pretrial conference would also be too late.