Full access allows:
- Solve all tests online without limits;
- Remove all advertisements on website;
- Adding questions to favorite list;
- Save learning progress;
- Save results of practice exams;
- Watching all wrong answered questions.
A homeowner from State A sued a man from State B in a federal district court in State B. The single-count complaint alleged breach of contract, asked for the remedy of specific performance, and demanded a jury under the Seventh Amendment. The man argued to the court that the homeowner is not entitled to a jury.
There are no comments at the moment. If you found an error or think question is incorrect, tell everyone about it
Only signed in users can write comments
Signin
A is incorrect. While it is true that the Seventh Amendment's jury guarantee generally is available where a plaintiff seeks both legal and equitable remedies, the plaintiff here seeks an exclusively equitable remedy, which is not a suit entitled to a jury under federal law.
B is incorrect. The Seventh Amendment guarantees a jury for suits at common law, and specific performance is a remedy in equity.
D is incorrect. The Seventh Amendment's application does not depend on the basis of the court's subject-matter jurisdiction.