Full access allows:
- Solve all tests online without limits;
- Remove all advertisements on website;
- Adding questions to favorite list;
- Save learning progress;
- Save results of practice exams;
- Watching all wrong answered questions.
The only applicable statute is a provision in the jurisdiction's probate code which provides that any property interest which is descendible is devisable.
Last month, the school district closed its school on Blackacre and for valid consideration duly executed and delivered a quitclaim deed of Blackacre to a developer, who planned to use the land for commercial development. The developer has now brought an appropriate action to quiet title against the testator's son, the friend, and the school district.
20 years ago, a testator who owned Blackacre, a one-acre tract of land, duly delivered a deed of Blackacre «to the school district so long as it is used for school purposes.» The deed was promptly and properly recorded. Five years ago, the testator died leaving his son as his only heir but, by his duly probated will, he left «all my Estate to my friend.»
There are no comments at the moment. If you found an error or think question is incorrect, tell everyone about it
Only signed in users can write comments
Signin
A is incorrect. The school district's interest reverted back to the testator because the school district terminated their interest by selling the land to the developer.
B is incorrect. Because the school district terminated their interest by selling Blackacre to the developer, the interest in Blackacre reverted back to the testator, whose heir was the friend. However, if the testator had not bequeathed his estate to the friend, then the interest would have reverted to the testator's son as the testator's only heir.
D is incorrect. The school district terminated its own interest in Blackacre.