Full access allows:
- Solve all tests online without limits;
- Remove all advertisements on website;
- Adding questions to favorite list;
- Save learning progress;
- Save results of practice exams;
- Watching all wrong answered questions.
Assume that the court properly ordered a partition by judicial sale.
The son needed cash, but the daughter did not wish to sell Blackacre. The son commenced a partition action against the daughter and the creditor.
A week ago, a creditor obtained a money judgment against the son and properly filed the judgment in the county where Blackacre is located. A statute in the jurisdiction provides: any judgment properly filed shall, for 10 years from filing, be a lien on the real property then owned or subsequently acquired by any person against whom the judgment is rendered.
A mother owned Blackacre, a two-family apartment house on a small city lot not suitable for partition-in-kind. Upon the mother's death, her will devised Blackacre to «my son and daughter.»
There are no comments at the moment. If you found an error or think question is incorrect, tell everyone about it
Only signed in users can write comments
Signin
A is incorrect. The creditor's lien only entitles him to property owned by the brother, so the creditor will not have a lien on the entire interest in Blackacre.
B is incorrect. The creditor's lien was on the brother's interest in Blackacre, and that interest terminated when the property was sold.
C is incorrect. As explained above, the creditor only has a lien on the brother's interest in Blackacre, not the proceeds of the sale.