Full access allows:
- Solve all tests online without limits;
- Remove all advertisements on website;
- Adding questions to favorite list;
- Save learning progress;
- Save results of practice exams;
- Watching all wrong answered questions.
A homeowner contracted in writing with a kitchen contractor to renovate her kitchen for $25,000, «subject to the homeowner's complete personal satisfaction.» The contractor replaced the cabinets, flooring, and countertops and then sought payment from the homeowner. The homeowner paid the contractor only $20,000, truthfully saying that she did not like the finish on the cabinets and was therefore not satisfied.
There are no comments at the moment. If you found an error or think question is incorrect, tell everyone about it
Only signed in users can write comments
Signin
B is incorrect. The contractor will not prevail because a condition to the homeowner's obligation to pay was not satisfied.
C is incorrect. As stated in the facts, the homeowner was truthful in her dissatisfaction with the finish of the cabinets. This would not amount to a breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing which would deny the contractor the benefit of the contract.
D is incorrect. As discussed above, there can be no breach of contract until a condition has been fulfilled. Because the condition of the homeowner's satisfaction had not been fulfilled, there is no breach of contract.