Full access allows:
- Solve all tests online without limits;
- Remove all advertisements on website;
- Adding questions to favorite list;
- Save learning progress;
- Save results of practice exams;
- Watching all wrong answered questions.
The plaintiff sued a church for damages he suffered when the plaintiff crashed his motorcycle in an attempt to avoid a cow that had escaped from its corral. The cow and corral belonged to a farm that had recently been left by will to the church. At trial, the plaintiff seeks to ask the defendant's witness whether she is a member of that church.
There are no comments at the moment. If you found an error or think question is incorrect, tell everyone about it
Only signed in users can write comments
Signin
A is incorrect. Although evidence of the beliefs or opinions of a witness on matters of religion is not admissible for the purpose of showing that by reason of their nature the witness's credibility is impaired or enhanced, the witness's membership in the defendant church is not being used for that improper reason. It is being used to ascertain any bias or motive to lie she may have.
B is incorrect. Violations of First Amendment and privacy rights do not lead to the exclusion of evidence in this case. Because the question is relevant and admissible, the witness cannot claim that the answer will violate her rights.
D is incorrect. The evidence is not being used to show the witness's capacity to understand the oath; it is being used to determine her possible motive to lie and her possible bias.