Full access allows:
- Solve all tests online without limits;
- Remove all advertisements on website;
- Adding questions to favorite list;
- Save learning progress;
- Save results of practice exams;
- Watching all wrong answered questions.
A defendant was prosecuted for sexually abusing his 13-year-old stepdaughter. The stepdaughter testified to the defendant's conduct. On cross-examination, defense counsel asks the stepdaughter, «Isn't it true that shortly before you complained that your stepfather abused you, he punished you for maliciously ruining some of his phonograph records?»
There are no comments at the moment. If you found an error or think question is incorrect, tell everyone about it
Only signed in users can write comments
Signin
B is incorrect. The stepdaughter's misconduct is actually irrelevant to her character for veracity. Ruining phonograph records has nothing to do with the stepdaughter's character for truthfulness or her credibility.
C is incorrect. Although the incident had nothing to do with the stepdaughter's character for truthfulness, the question is still proper to show that the stepdaughter may have a bias against the defendant or a motive to lie.
D is incorrect. A witness's bias or motive to lie can be inquired into upon during cross-examination, even if the direct examination did not deal with the incident. Cross-examination into matters affecting the credibility of the witness is proper.