Full access allows:
- Solve all tests online without limits;
- Remove all advertisements on website;
- Adding questions to favorite list;
- Save learning progress;
- Save results of practice exams;
- Watching all wrong answered questions.
A defendant was charged with the sale of narcotics. The federal prosecutor arranged with the defendant's wife for her to testify against her husband in exchange for leniency in her case. At trial, the prosecution calls the wife, who had been granted immunity from prosecution, to testify, among other things, that she saw her husband sell an ounce of heroin.
There are no comments at the moment. If you found an error or think question is incorrect, tell everyone about it
Only signed in users can write comments
Signin
A is incorrect. The adverse spousal privilege is the wife's, and the determination of whether to testify or not is her decision to make. The defendant cannot object and force his wife not to testify.
B is incorrect. The defendant's wife can testify, if she wishes, that she saw her husband sell heroin. Her testimony about her firsthand knowledge of the sale does not require that the wife disclose any privileged marital communication from her husband. She will testify as to what she saw.
D is incorrect. The adverse spousal privilege still exists. If the wife wishes not to testify against her husband, she cannot be compelled, in federal court, to do so.