Full access allows:
- Solve all tests online without limits;
- Remove all advertisements on website;
- Adding questions to favorite list;
- Save learning progress;
- Save results of practice exams;
- Watching all wrong answered questions.
A passenger is suing a defendant for injuries suffered in the crash of a small airplane, alleging that the defendant had owned the plane and negligently failed to have it properly maintained. The defendant has asserted in defense that he never owned the plane or had any responsibility to maintain it. At trial, the passenger calls a witness to testify that the witness had sold to the defendant a liability insurance policy on the plane.
There are no comments at the moment. If you found an error or think question is incorrect, tell everyone about it
Only signed in users can write comments
Signin
A is incorrect. The witness is not testifying to the content of the policy, only to its existence, and is not required to introduce the policy itself before he can testify.
B is incorrect. It misstates the standard for determining whether the witness's testimony is admissible.
C is incorrect. The existence of the policy is admissible and relevant to show the defendant's ownership or responsibility for the airplane, not his motivation to invest money in the airplane. It is the defendant's ownership of the plane that is at issue, and the witness's testimony is admissible as proof on that issue.