Full access allows:
- Solve all tests online without limits;
- Remove all advertisements on website;
- Adding questions to favorite list;
- Save learning progress;
- Save results of practice exams;
- Watching all wrong answered questions.
33. Should the court uphold the constitutionality of the agency's rules?
After the agency issued such rules, several states filed an action challenging the rules on the sole ground that they are unconstitutional.
A federal statute authorizes a federal agency to issue rules requiring that state legislatures adopt laws of limited duration to reduce water pollution from gasoline-powered boat motors. The purpose of these rules is to assist the agency in attaining the clean water standards required by the statute.
Comments (0)
There are no comments at the moment. If you found an error or think question is incorrect, tell everyone about it
Only signed in users can write comments
Signin
Congress may encourage state legislatures to pass certain laws by, for example, conditioning receipt of federal funding on passing laws, via Congress's spending power under Article I, Section 8. But even then, if a spending act imposes limitations on a state, or attaches «strings,» the limitations must be: (i) merely an incentive and not a compulsion; (ii) clearly stated; and (iii) related to the act's purpose (also phrased as having a «nexus» between the purpose and the limitations).
The Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Section 1, Clause 2) invalidates any state action that is contrary to validly-enacted federal law. This Clause ensures that the U.S. Constitution, and federal laws made pursuant to it, constitute the supreme law of the land. It prohibits states from interfering with the federal government's exercise of legislative and constitutional powers.
A is correct. The court should not uphold the constitutionality of the agency's rules because the Tenth Amendment, as interpreted by the Supreme Court in New York v. United States, ensures that states cannot be forced to enact certain laws. Although Congress (and by extension federal entities) may encourage states to pass certain laws, it may not force them to do so.
B is incorrect. This answer reaches the correct answer with the wrong reasoning. Although the court should not uphold the constitutionality of the state's rules, it is not because states have immunity from all direct federal regulation. This is an overstatement of the purview of the Tenth Amendment, which reserves powers to the states not delegated to the federal government by the Constitution. This is far from granting states immunity from federal regulation. It is, however, unconstitutional for states to be required to enact certain laws, as explained above.
C is incorrect. The rule prohibiting the federal government from forcing states to enact laws prevails here, regardless of whether the rules aim to serve an important purpose or are limited in scope.
D is incorrect. The Supremacy Clause states that the Constitution, and federal laws made pursuant to it, constitute the supreme law of the land. It prohibits states from interfering with the federal government's exercise of constitutional powers. The Supremacy Clause does not apply here.