Full access allows:
- Solve all tests online without limits;
- Remove all advertisements on website;
- Adding questions to favorite list;
- Save learning progress;
- Save results of practice exams;
- Watching all wrong answered questions.
A teacher from State A filed a diversity action against a janitor from State B in State B federal court. The janitor was served with a summons from the court, but not a copy of the complaint.
There are no comments at the moment. If you found an error or think question is incorrect, tell everyone about it
Only signed in users can write comments
Signin
Here, the facts indicate that the defendant had only been served with a summons but not a complaint. Therefore, the janitor should file a motion to dismiss for insufficient process.
A is incorrect. The federal district court in State B would have personal jurisdiction over a State B citizen.
B is incorrect. It would be far more efficient for the janitor to file only a motion for insufficient process than for him to file an answer, in which he would have to respond to all of the complaint's allegations.
D is incorrect. There is nothing in the facts to suggest that the court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction.