Full access allows:
- Solve all tests online without limits;
- Remove all advertisements on website;
- Adding questions to favorite list;
- Save learning progress;
- Save results of practice exams;
- Watching all wrong answered questions.
A homeowner filed a diversity action against a plumber in federal court in State A. The homeowner alleged that the plumber failed to finish performing work on a $150,000 service contract concerning the installation of a bathroom in the homeowner's home. The plumber disputed the contract's validity at trial, testifying before the jury that the plumber and homeowner never had a contract and that the parties were joking when referring to a «contract» in their exchanged emails. The plumber offered undisputed evidence that he is a contractor by profession, who specializes in bathroom installation. After the close of evidence, the homeowner's attorney filed a motion for judgment as a matter of law, which the court rejected. The jury then returned a verdict for the plumber.
There are no comments at the moment. If you found an error or think question is incorrect, tell everyone about it
Only signed in users can write comments
Signin
Here, the homeowner may therefore submit both a renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law and a motion for a new trial.
A is incorrect. Pursuant to the FRCP, parties may make a renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law. This renewed motion can only be made if a party has previously made a motion for judgment as a matter of law. Because the homeowner previously made a motion for judgment as a matter of law, the homeowner may now file a renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law in addition to a motion for a new trial.
B is incorrect. As stated above, the FRCP allow parties to make a renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law in conjunction with a motion for a new trial.
D is incorrect. As stated above, a renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law and a motion for new trial are available to the homeowner, who may file both. Those motions do not have to be combined with a motion for relief from judgment.