34. May the homeowner file a renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law and motion for a new trial?

A homeowner filed a diversity action against a plumber in federal court in State A. The homeowner alleged that the plumber failed to finish performing work on a $150,000 service contract concerning the installation of a bathroom in the homeowner's home. The plumber disputed the contract's validity at trial, testifying before the jury that the plumber and homeowner never had a contract and that the parties were joking when referring to a «contract» in their exchanged emails. The plumber offered undisputed evidence that he is a contractor by profession, who specializes in bathroom installation. After the close of evidence, the homeowner's attorney filed a motion for judgment as a matter of law, which the court rejected. The jury then returned a verdict for the plumber.

Comments (0)

There are no comments at the moment. If you found an error or think question is incorrect, tell everyone about it