44. Is the court likely to consider the grocer's defenses?

A shopper sued a grocer in federal court for violation of the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetics Act. In its pre-answer motion, the grocer raised the defenses of lack of personal jurisdiction and lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The court denied the motion. Thereafter, the grocer realized that it arguably had available to it the defenses of improper venue and failure to join a required party. The grocer then filed an answer to the shopper's complaint raising these two additional defenses for the first time.

Comments (0)

There are no comments at the moment. If you found an error or think question is incorrect, tell everyone about it