Full access allows:
- Solve all tests online without limits;
- Remove all advertisements on website;
- Adding questions to favorite list;
- Save learning progress;
- Save results of practice exams;
- Watching all wrong answered questions.
13. The additional drug store owners' testimony is
In rebuttal, the prosecutor calls two additional drug store owners to testify that, on May 1, a man they identified as the defendant had presented prescriptions for Percodan from a doctor at their drug stores.
A defendant was charged with using a forged prescription from a doctor to obtain Percodan from a drugstore on May 1. At trial, the drugstore owner identified the defendant as the customer, but the defendant testified that he had not been in the store.
Comments (0)
There are no comments at the moment. If you found an error or think question is incorrect, tell everyone about it
Only signed in users can write comments
Signin
A is incorrect. Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show action in conformity therewith.
C is incorrect. The additional drug store owners' testimony is not being used to prove character; it is being used to prove identity. Used for this purpose, the testimony is admissible even though it covers specific acts.
D is incorrect. Although evidence of other crimes is inadmissible to prove propensity, evidence of the other crimes in this case is admissible to prove identity.