Full access allows:
- Solve all tests online without limits;
- Remove all advertisements on website;
- Adding questions to favorite list;
- Save learning progress;
- Save results of practice exams;
- Watching all wrong answered questions.
A defendant is on trial for nighttime breaking and entering of a warehouse. The warehouse owner had set up a camera to take infrared pictures of any intruders. After an expert establishes the reliability of infrared photography, the prosecutor offers the authenticated infrared picture of the intruder to show the similarities to the defendant.
There are no comments at the moment. If you found an error or think question is incorrect, tell everyone about it
Only signed in users can write comments
Signin
A is incorrect. The expert witness is not required to point out the similarities to the jury before the photograph is identifiable and admissible.
C is incorrect. There does not need to be an eyewitness to the scene available to authenticate the photograph if the photo is already authenticated by the testimony of the expert witness.
D is incorrect. The photograph is not a witness that the defendant has a right to «confront.» Because the jury is able to make a comparison between the photograph and the defendant, the photograph is admissible.