Full access allows:
- Solve all tests online without limits;
- Remove all advertisements on website;
- Adding questions to favorite list;
- Save learning progress;
- Save results of practice exams;
- Watching all wrong answered questions.
A plaintiff sued an auto manufacturing company for his wife's death, claiming that a defective steering mechanism on the family car caused it to veer off the road and hit a tree when his wife was driving. The defendant claims that the steering mechanism was damaged in the collision and offers testimony that the deceased wife was intoxicated at the time of the accident.
There are no comments at the moment. If you found an error or think question is incorrect, tell everyone about it
Only signed in users can write comments
Signin
B is incorrect. The plaintiff's wife's intoxication at the time of the accident is not character evidence; it is evidence of her factual, bodily state at the time of the accident. It is relevant because her intoxication may have caused the accident.
C is incorrect. The evidence of the wife's intoxication at the time of the accident is not character evidence.
D is incorrect. Evidence of the wife's intoxication is probative on the issue of the cause of the accident and is not unfairly prejudicial.