Full access allows:
- Solve all tests online without limits;
- Remove all advertisements on website;
- Adding questions to favorite list;
- Save learning progress;
- Save results of practice exams;
- Watching all wrong answered questions.
The builder has sued the homeowner for the $30,000 contract price of the first bathroom, which remains unpaid.
A homeowner entered into a contract with a builder under which the builder was to install two new bathrooms in the homeowner's house. The stated price for the first bathroom was $30,000, and the price for the second bathroom was $35,000. The builder, without justification, left the job after completing the $30,000 bathroom. The homeowner found another contractor to complete the second bathroom for $35,000 and has suffered no losses as a result of the builder's breach.
There are no comments at the moment. If you found an error or think question is incorrect, tell everyone about it
Only signed in users can write comments
Signin
A is incorrect. The builder will be able to recover despite his breach because the rule of divisible contract provides a way to fairly compensate a party who has materially breached a contract.
B is incorrect. The rule of divisible contract allows the builder to recover contractual damages even though he breached the contract. He is entitled to recover the agreed-upon price for the installation of the first bathroom because it is a divisible portion of the contract.
C is incorrect. When a breaching party can recover under the rule of divisible contract, it is not necessary to look to restitution to provide a remedy.