Full access allows:
- Solve all tests online without limits;
- Remove all advertisements on website;
- Adding questions to favorite list;
- Save learning progress;
- Save results of practice exams;
- Watching all wrong answered questions.
A woman belonged to an organization that advocated for the United States to preemptively attack certain foreign countries. The organization usually used leafleting and public speeches to advance this view, but it sometimes engaged in violent demonstrations against the embassies and consuls of those countries. Although the woman had never participated in a violent demonstration, she was criminally prosecuted for being a member of the organization. In her defense, the woman claimed that her association with the organization was protected by the First Amendment.
There are no comments at the moment. If you found an error or think question is incorrect, tell everyone about it
Only signed in users can write comments
Signin
B is incorrect. This does not prove that the woman had the intent to further the organization's illegal activities. It would not be enough for the prosecution to show that the woman merely provided material aid to the organization.
C is incorrect. This answer choice still does not demonstrate that the woman had the specific intent to further illegal action.
D is incorrect. The woman's expression of public support does not illustrate that she had the specific intent to further illegal activities.