91. Is the mayor's selection of the other contractor constitutional?

When the road construction projects for the next year were put out to bid, the owner of the local paving company was again the lowest bidder. The mayor, however, vetoed the selection and chose a contractor from farther away, at a much higher price. State law does not require selection of the lowest bidder.

In a recent town mayoral election, the owner supported the candidate challenging the incumbent mayor. The owner's paving trucks carried bumper stickers promoting the challenger. When the incumbent mayor saw the owner in a local restaurant, the mayor said, «You'd better get those bumper stickers off your trucks or you'll never pave another road in this town again.» The owner refused to comply. The incumbent mayor won the election.

The owner of a local road-paving company has for several years provided road repair and maintenance services for a small town under an annual contract. The owner's price is usually lower than the prices of other bidders because the owner's equipment and personnel are located in the town.

Comments (0)

There are no comments at the moment. If you found an error or think question is incorrect, tell everyone about it