116. Assuming the validity of the motorcyclist's negligence claim against the EMS firm, which of the following best characterizes the dealership's potential liability?

The motorcyclist has sued both the EMS firm and the dealership, alleging that the EMT's careless conduct caused his paralysis.

A motorcyclist participating in the race was injured when he lost control of his motorcycle. The motorcyclist was treated at the scene by the EMTs. In removing the motorcyclist's helmet, one of the EMTs twisted the motorcyclist's neck, causing him to become permanently paralyzed.

A racetrack held a motorcycle race, which was sponsored by a local motorcycle dealership. Under the sponsorship agreement, the dealership was required to arrange for licensed and trained emergency medical technicians (EMTs) to be present during the race. The dealership contracted with a licensed and reputable emergency medical services (EMS) firm that supplied EMTs for events such as these.

This is a last question in category

« Go to questions from category Negligence

Comments (0)

There are no comments at the moment. If you found an error or think question is incorrect, tell everyone about it