Full access allows:
- Solve all tests online without limits;
- Remove all advertisements on website;
- Adding questions to favorite list;
- Save learning progress;
- Save results of practice exams;
- Watching all wrong answered questions.
As a result of this experience, the plaintiff suffered great emotional distress.
A plaintiff's three-year-old daughter was killed in an automobile accident. At the plaintiff's direction, the child's body was taken to a mausoleum for interment. Normally, the mausoleum's vaults are permanently sealed with marble plates secured by «tamper-proof» screws. After the child's body was placed in a mausoleum, however, only a fiberglass panel secured by caulking compound covered her vault. About a month later, the child's body was discovered in a cemetery located near the mausoleum. It had apparently been left there by vandals who had taken it from the mausoleum.
There are no comments at the moment. If you found an error or think question is incorrect, tell everyone about it
Only signed in users can write comments
Signin
A is incorrect. The mausoleum directly created a foreseeable risk of harm by directly causing severe emotional distress through its failure to properly secure the vault.
B is incorrect. Extreme and outrageous behavior is an element of an intentional infliction of emotional distress claim, and the mausoleum did not intentionally act in an extreme and outrageous manner.
D is incorrect. No physical harm is required when the negligent infliction of emotional distress action arises from the mishandling of a relative's corpse.