Full access allows:
- Solve all tests online without limits;
- Remove all advertisements on website;
- Adding questions to favorite list;
- Save learning progress;
- Save results of practice exams;
- Watching all wrong answered questions.
The Sports Championship Revenue Enhancement Act is a federal statute that was enacted as part of a comprehensive program to eliminate the federal budget deficit. That act imposed, for a period of five years, a 50% excise tax on the price of tickets to championship sporting events. Such events included the World Series, the Super Bowl, major college bowl games, and similar championship sports events.
There are no comments at the moment. If you found an error or think question is incorrect, tell everyone about it
Only signed in users can write comments
Signin
Congress has the power to lay and collect taxes, imposts, and excises, but they must be uniform throughout the United States. The requirement of uniformity in the levy of indirect taxes (which generally means any kind of «privilege» tax, including duties and excises) has been interpreted by the Court to mean geographical uniformity only — i.e., identical taxation of the Taxed Article in every state where it is found. Fernandez v. Wiener, 326 U.S. 340 (1945).
MBE Tip: Absent a specific restriction, be very hesitant to rule against a tax measure on the MBE. A tax measure will be upheld if it bears some reasonable relationship to revenue production or if Congress has the power to regulate the taxed activity.
B is correct. The federal tax is probably constitutional because Congress has broad power to tax for the general welfare, as long as the measure bears any reasonable relationship to revenue production. The tax measure here satisfies that standard, as it is intended to eliminate the federal budget deficit. Although the 50% excise tax may have adverse economic consequences, it is uniform and revenue-based, and thus falls within the federal power to tax.
A is incorrect. This answer reaches the correct answer with the wrong reasoning. The federal tax is probably constitutional, but not because it passes strict scrutiny, a standard of review not applicable to taxation measures. The «compelling national interest» in reducing the federal budget deficit is not required, as that would be a higher bar than necessary. The tax need only be uniform and bear some reasonable relationship to revenue production.
C is incorrect. Even though a 50% tax may be likely to reduce attendance at championship sporting events, this does not negate the rational relationship between the tax and the interest in eliminating the budget deficit. The rational relationship exists because taxing in this context is related to revenue production, despite the adverse consequences, such as reduced attendance.
D is incorrect. A congressional tax measure is only required to be reasonably related to revenue efforts, as explained above. The fact that sporting events are singled out is irrelevant because there is no right to equal protection for «sporting events,» only people.