MBE Prep
Home
Sign in
Contacts
Exam
Download
Search
Homepage
»
Criminal Law
Constitutional Protection of Accused Persons
Download PDF
Progress:
24
%
(
23
/94)
Learning progress
?
1. If the driver moves to suppress the use as evidence of the marijuana and cocaine found in the search of the truck, the court should
Not learned
2. If the young woman moves to suppress the use as evidence of the heroin, the court should
Not learned
3. The motion should be
Not learned
4. The man's confession is
Not learned
5. Which of these grounds provides a constitutional basis for relief?
Not learned
6. As to the defendant's motion to suppress, the court should
Not learned
7. Her motion to prevent the introduction of the dress into evidence will be
Not learned
8. The man's constitutional rights were
Not learned
9. With regard to the diary, the court should
Not learned
10. Consistent with the law and the Constitution, the jury may convict the defendant of
Not learned
11. The woman's contention is
Not learned
12. His claim is
Not learned
13. The defendant's objection will most likely be
Not learned
14. The court should
Not learned
15. Based on these conclusions, the judge should grant the motion to suppress
Not learned
16. Which of the following correctly describes the judge's situation?
Not learned
17. The court should
Not learned
18. The best argument for excluding it would be that
Not learned
19. The motion should be
Not learned
20. On appeal, the defendant's conviction should be
Not learned
21. The woman's motion should be
Not learned
22. If the executive director is convicted of trespass by an all-white jury and appeals, claiming a violation of her constitutional rights, the court should
Not learned
23. Which of the following proposed reforms would be unconstitutional?
Not learned
24. As to the switchblade knife and the .45-caliber pistol, the suspect's motion to suppress should be
Not learned
25. As to the suspect's statement, his motion to suppress should be
Not learned
26. As to the automatic weapon found in the closet, the suspect's motion to suppress should be
Not learned
27. If the court finds that the police did not have probable cause to believe the defendant was the robber until they saw him inside the homeowner's house and realized he matched the description, the court should
Not learned
28. The motion should be
Not learned
29. If the rival moves to suppress his admission about killing his neighbor, the court should
Not learned
30. If the rival moves to exclude the introduction of the marijuana farmer's clothing into evidence, the court should
Not learned
31. The defendant's motion should be:
Not learned
32. The court should
Not learned
33. Should the woman’s motion be granted?
Not learned
34. Should the motion be granted?
Not learned
35. Should the motion be granted?
Not learned
36. How should the court rule on the defendant’s motion to suppress?
Not learned
37. Should the court grant the employee’s motion?
Not learned
38. Should the defendant’s motion be granted?
Not learned
39. Should the court suppress the diary?
Not learned
40. How should the trial judge instruct the jury regarding the burden of proof on the issue of consent?
Not learned
41. Should the court dismiss the indictment?
Not learned
42. Should the court grant the motion to suppress the machine gun?
Not learned
43. Should the man’s motion to suppress be granted?
Not learned
44. Should the marijuana plants be suppressed?
Not learned
45. Under what circumstances, if any, may the grand jury compel production of the diary over the suspect’s assertion of his Fifth Amendment privilege?
Not learned
46. Should the court grant the motion and suppress the store owner’s trial testimony identifying the defendant as the robber?
Not learned
47. How should the court proceed?
Not learned
48. What is the man’s best argument for granting his motion?
Not learned
49. Should the court grant the motion?
Not learned
50. How should the court of appeals rule on the conviction and the death sentence?
Not learned
51. As to the defendant’s claim of alibi, which of the following additional instructions would be proper?
Not learned
52. How should the court decide the young woman’s motion?
Not learned
53. Should the court grant the motion?
Not learned
54. Which of the following steps should the prosecutor take to get the woman to answer the question?
Not learned
55. Should the defendant's motion be granted?
Not learned
56. Can the cellmate's testimony be admitted in a joint trial over the second defendant's objection?
Not learned
57. If the court grants the defendant's motion, what will be the most likely reason?
Not learned
58. What is the strongest basis for a defense objection to the psychologist's testimony regarding the defendant's mental state?
Not learned
59. Are the man and the passenger correct?
Not learned
60. Was the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel violated?
Not learned
61. On appeal, what should the appellate court do?
Not learned
62. What finding regarding the defendant’s possession of a deadly weapon is necessary for the court to impose a 10-year sentence?
Not learned
63. How should the court rule regarding the driver’s statement admitting his drinking?
Not learned
64. Would the second trial violate the prohibition against double jeopardy?
Not learned
65. Should the court grant the motion to suppress?
Not learned
66. Did the search of the garbage cans violate the Fourth Amendment?
Not learned
67. Should the appellate court grant the defendant’s request?
Not learned
68. What more, if anything, must the trial court find in order to sustain the defendant’s Sixth Amendment claim?
Not learned
69. Should the court grant the motion to dismiss?
Not learned
70. Should the court grant the motion to suppress?
Not learned
71. Did the trial court’s instruction violate the defendant’s federal constitutional rights?
Not learned
72. Should the court suppress the statements?
Not learned
73. Did the life-without-parole sentence violate the Eighth Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishment?
Not learned
74. Should the court grant the motion to suppress?
Not learned
75. Can the subpoena be enforced?
Not learned
76. Did the court’s jury selection process violate the defendant’s federal constitutional rights?
Not learned
77. Should the court grant the motion to suppress?
Not learned
78. Should the court suppress the DNA sample?
Not learned
79. If the court finds a reasonable probability that the mitigating evidence, if presented, would have affected the jury’s sentence, should the court grant the petition?
Not learned
80. How is the court likely to rule?
Not learned
81. Should the court grant the woman’s motion to suppress?
Not learned
82. Should the court grant the motion to suppress?
Not learned
83. Did the collection of the data violate the Fourth Amendment?
Not learned
84. How should the federal court of appeals decide the issue?
Not learned
85. Should the court of appeals reverse the conviction?
Not learned
86. Which of the following, if authorized by state law, would be constitutionally permissible?
Not learned
87. Is the second man’s death sentence constitutional?
Not learned
88. May the defendant properly be retried on the original charge of first-degree murder?
Not learned
89. Can the state appellate court overturn the conviction based on the prosecution’s failure to disclose the witness’s prior perjury conviction?
Not learned
90. If the appeals court finds that the trial court should not have admitted the testimony, does it have the authority to reverse a conviction when the trial attorney raised no objection to the challenged testimony?
Not learned
Trial period expired
You are not allowed to do this without «Full access»
Full access allows:
Solve all tests online without limits;
Remove all advertisements on website;
Adding questions to favorite list;
Save learning progress;
Save results of practice exams;
Watching all wrong answered questions.
Activate full access