Full access allows:
- Solve all tests online without limits;
- Remove all advertisements on website;
- Adding questions to favorite list;
- Save learning progress;
- Save results of practice exams;
- Watching all wrong answered questions.
The defendant has moved to quash the indictment on the ground of double jeopardy.
The prosecutor then called the same four witnesses before a grand jury. The grand jury indicted the same defendant for attempted murder.
A defendant was charged with attempted murder. At the preliminary hearing, the presiding judge heard the testimony of four prosecution witnesses and found that the prosecution had failed to establish probable cause that the defendant had committed any offense. Accordingly, he dismissed the charge.
There are no comments at the moment. If you found an error or think question is incorrect, tell everyone about it
Only signed in users can write comments
Signin
C is correct. Because the proceedings had only gone so far as the preliminary hearing, and no witness had been sworn or jury empaneled, jeopardy had not yet attached. As a result, there are no double jeopardy protections against being indicted by the grand jury after it was dismissed during the preliminary hearing.
A is incorrect. The first charge was dismissed by a judge during a preliminary hearing. No jury had been empaneled and no witness sworn in for purposes of trial, and therefore, jeopardy had not yet attached. Subsequently, any further prosecution as the result of a grand jury indictment is not barred.
B is incorrect. There is no requirement that the prosecution must present evidence to the grand jury that wasn't presented previously during the preliminary hearing in order to properly secure an indictment. As stated above, jeopardy had not yet attached, and therefore the prosecution acted within its power to take the evidence to a grand jury to obtain the indictment.
D is incorrect. This answer reaches the correct answer with the wrong reasoning. Although the motion should be denied because jeopardy had not attached, it is not necessary that a conviction or acquittal occur in order to be protected against double jeopardy.