Full access allows:
- Solve all tests online without limits;
- Remove all advertisements on website;
- Adding questions to favorite list;
- Save learning progress;
- Save results of practice exams;
- Watching all wrong answered questions.
A defendant was charged with manslaughter. At the preliminary hearing, the magistrate dismissed the charge on the ground that the evidence was insufficient. The prosecutor then brought the case before a grand jury. After hearing the evidence presented by the prosecutor, the grand jury refused to return an indictment. The prosecutor waited a few months until a new grand jury had been impaneled and brought the case before that grand jury, which returned an indictment charging the defendant with manslaughter. The defendant has moved to dismiss the indictment on double jeopardy grounds.
There are no comments at the moment. If you found an error or think question is incorrect, tell everyone about it
Only signed in users can write comments
Signin
A is correct. In this case, no jury had been empaneled, nor had a bench trial begun. As a result, jeopardy had not yet attached. Because there is no jeopardy during preliminary hearings or grand jury investigations, the prosecution acted properly and the motion should be denied.
B is incorrect. This answer reaches the correct answer with the wrong reasoning. Jeopardy does not only attach upon a conviction or acquittal. It attaches prior to judgment (whether on conviction or acquittal), but not until, in a jury trial, the jury is sworn, and in a bench trial, when the court begins to hear evidence.
C is incorrect. This is a misstatement of the law. Jeopardy does not attach following a preliminary hearing, it attaches upon the swearing-in of a jury or the presentation of evidence (swearing-in of the first witness) during a bench trial.
D is incorrect. As stated above, jeopardy does not attach until, in a jury trial, the jury has been empaneled, or during a bench trial, when the judge begins to hear evidence. Bringing the evidence before a second grand jury is within the prosecution's power because double jeopardy does not bar a grand jury from returning an indictment a previously impaneled grand jury refused to do so. See United States v. Williams, 504 U.S. 36, 49 (1992).